Why does the profession lose its meaning in the period when urbanization accelerates so much? The human being tries catch it and to shape the city to, but the city is an organism. Despite all of the designers' political, ideological, logistical failures, the city improving itself. They are making a plan to turn a sick patient into a life of the most profitable way. It is difficult to think about life and the city, leaving personal ego and satisfaction. They feel themselves responsible for the collapse of the city. We comport with two parallel thoughts. One of them we protected or restored the cities, we rebuilt them. Or we have made new places to drag the city to chaos. It was mocked by the city's personality, and as a result, education, economy, everything was affected from it.

From my point of view, we must focus on the problem with leaving eternal utopias, egos, blames, excuses. Now the concept of urbanism has disappeared and we think urbanism is only beautiful architectural works. We take refuge in the architectural works that we think a city is doing beautifully.Now, architecture brings chaos and after a while the city will no longer function. If urbanism will exist again, they should be able to see what they can do it. He should set up his own consistent scripts. If necessary, it should be against architecture. But this complicated system we live in, the city, should be taken as a whole. If activities and human life can continue in a cycle, urbanism means success.